Climate refugees

AS the number of people displaced worldwide because of climate change-related events continues to grow, the United Nations and its partners are focusing on regional approaches, framed by existing practices, to respond to the issue of “climate refugees”.

The number of disaster displacements on annual average between 2008 and 2016 amounted to 25.3 million, according to figures released by the Norwegian Refugee Council.

The five countries globally that have the highest proportion of their population affected by displacements are all island states: Cuba, Fiji, Philippines, Tonga and Sri Lanka.

“During this hurricane season alone for example, we saw the displacement of 1.7 million people in Cuba — that’s the equivalent of 15 per cent of its population,” said Camila Minerva, Humanitarian Program Manager with Oxfam in the Dominican Republic, during a press conference on ‘human mobility and climate change’ at the UN Climate Conference (COP23), in Bonn, Germany.

“The poorest and the most marginalised are five times more likely to be displaced and remain so for a longer time than people in higher income countries, and is increasing with climate change,” she added. Mariam Traore, migration, environment and climate change specialist with the UN International Organizaton for Migration (IOM), said that it was also important to remember that the slow onset effect of climate change made people move and migrate, sometimes in a forced way.

“In a country like Bangladesh, we did a survey last year and 40 per cent of the households we interviewed told us that climate change contributed directly to their decision to migrate,” she explained.

In this context, some have suggested the creation of a “climate refugee” status, to protect those forced to leave their country because of the impacts of climate change.

“The legal status for refugees is provided by the 1951 Refugee Convention, which is very clear on what, which is basically persecution,” said Marine Franck, program officer (climate change), division of international protection, in the office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

“In the context of climate change displacement, there might be cases where there is persecution involved where this refugee status could apply but in most cases, it doesn’t,” she added.

She recalled that in 2011, states suggested that UNHCR create a new status of refugee for people displaced because of climate change. “But some states were not at all ready for that,” she stated.

Ms Franck stressed that this issue of broadening the scope of refugee protection “is not necessarily desirable, because there is a risk of undermining the refugees fleeing persecution and violent conflict.”

Moreover, she explained: “We would need also to renegotiate the convention and there is no appetite for that from states and it might not be the most effective protection tool.”

UNHCR thinks it is better to look at what exists at the regional level and try to have a bottom-up approach with broadening at the regional level using practices that are effective.

She mentioned humanitarian protection visas, temporary protection and stay arrangements, as well as migration laws that can provide real protection.

“It is much more effective because States are going to look at what their neighbours are doing and may adopt the same kind of procedures, rather than if we adopt a global convention or a new category it might not be easy to negotiate and it is not also sure that states will then implement it properly,” Ms Franck said.

More Stories